@article{167131,
  author = {Lyndon D. Estes and Bethany A. Bradley and H. Beukes and D.G. Hole and M. Lau and Michael Oppenheimer and R. Schulze and M.A. Tadross and W. R. Turner},
  title = {Comparing mechanistic and empirical model projections of crop suitability and productivity: Implications for ecological forecasting},
  abstract = { <span style="display:inline!important;float:none;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);color:rgb(28,29,30);OpenSans,icomoon,sans-serif;16px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;orphans:2;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;-webkit-text-stroke-width:0px;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;">Intercomparison of mechanistic and empirical models is an important step towards improving projections of potential species distribution and abundance. We aim to compare suitability and productivity estimates for a well-understood crop species to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of mechanistic versus empirical modelling.</span> },
  year = {2013},
  journal = {Global Ecology and Biogeography},
  volume = {Vol. 22},
  language = {eng},
}